CLANCY OVERELL | Editor | CONTACT
A downtrodden and exploited member of the nation’s oppressed white middle class has today raised a proverbial fist salute in defiance of the elitist tyrants that live to dehumanise him and ridicule his place in Australian society.
Eric Bernabbott (62) was originally not going to play any part in the current Australian same-sex marriage postal vote, due to a lack of interest in gay people or politics – however, after months of campaigning and lobbying from Christian groups and conservative politicians, Eric says he agrees that this whole government survey will lead to much more than the specific change to the marriage act that the entire thing has been about from the start.
“Who knows what it’ll lead to” says Mr Bernabbott, who hasn’t spoken to his own son in ten years after a heated argument over his own father’s inheritance.
“And I’m sick of being told what to do by these lefties and culturally elite”
Eric says in a last minute decision he posted off his non-compulsory postal response on the final hours of the survey. He voted no.
“I wasn’t too interested until I realised that this is going to be the only way to stop ourselves, well, people like me from being pushed around by the PC brigade” he says
“Political correctness has been oppressing me for years. It all started with that dress up party when I went as Muhammad Ali. You should have heard them banging on – it was like I’d just vilified an entire race of people”
“My kids weren’t even allowed to play with gollywogs when they were kids”
Mr Bernabbott, who has run an outdoor fishing and camping retail business since the 1960s and owns two investment properties the recently gentrified suburb his kids live in, says the scourge of political correctness is getting worse and all he wants to do is make academics and civil rights advocates know that they don’t mean shit.
“Tony Abbott is right about how I feel. I’m sick of experts”
He says he didn’t realise how bad political correctness was until the organisations currently facing a royal commission into several centuries of child sex crimes told him that he was being told how to think by the gay oppressors.
“What’s next, gay people get the right to divorce as well?”
“This has all gone too far”
The YES side can pretend that everyone should do it their way, but they simply don’t command the authority or influence to be believed – they say we don’t need to be worried, but more and more damage is being inflicted on people who oppose SSM. The consequences of changing marriage and the tactics being used to achieve SSM are unknown and unexplained by the YES side. This goes for all the YES tactics and so the NO side builds. Equality, fairness, rights and love already occurs in the Marriage Act, but homosexuals choose not to marry this way (by marrying as the Marriage Act outlines) and so they are wanting a new marriage concept. We don’t know how it will affect all facets of our lives and already we see the YES side impacting our lives in a million unpleasant ways in the way we watch/play sport, fly on airplanes, eating ice cream, Barbie dolls, clothes we wear, etc….indeed, the impact in our lives is far, far more than just same sex couples getting married. The YES side ignores all the consequences and so they blindly lose support day by day as the postal vote draws to a close.
This is about re-defining the word and meaning of “marriage”. It’s not about equality, otherwise everyone would be allowed to marry everyone and anyone, regardless of age, marital status and/or blood relations. THAT would be equality. How about we re-define the word “masturbation” since it’s one of the words you used to make your point? How about we say that going to the toilet is the same as masturbation? Since the mechanics and “plumbing” (pun intended) are the same? ….That’s the equivalent comparison with the SSM debate going on. It’s about RE-DEFINITION.
There is a fundamental contradiction between LGBTIQ people wanting to exert their identity while at the same time wanting to lay claim to an institution (ie. marriage) that is associated with gender identities that are not theirs. This because SSM is not about gay rights. Gays have the right to create their own institution of commitment that they can take pride in. They do not need to take someone else’s institution. SSM is the exploitation of committed gay couples by the activist Left to advance their own political agenda…..and ‘they’ are starting to get worried, and as time passes there are more and more public gaffes betraying the real agenda. And that agenda is not really concern for the ‘happiness’ of a very small group of ‘gays’ who would be interested in legal marriage for themselves. Not all gays want it, and not all homosexuals even agree that marriage should be made gender neutral. Shall we think for a moment who the ‘they’ might be who are trying to introduce a monumental social change but pretend that its only a minor ‘adjustment’ for the sake of ‘gays’? It’s more than a gay lobby. It includes many, many who are not homosexual but realise something that Lenin and Trotsky and the Bolsheviks and the so-called ‘Frankfurt school’ understood very well: revolutions begin with the destruction of families and all the sexual and religious codes maintaining families. Then, truly, will you have an all powerful state, which once captured will be free to introduce the paradise of nihilism, where only power matters, and only those who possess it matter. It sounds a bit rich, I know. But it’s definitely more than just a ‘gay lobby’ who are getting worried.
I’m not entirely sure whether Neil Aitchison is for real or if he’s having a bit of a laugh.
Either way, he’s a bad dog who should stop chewing the rug.