Andrew Bolt: ‘Why Milat Was Wrongly Convicted After An Appalling Leftist Smear Campaign’

OPINION

Ivan Milat, the remarkably unpopular serial killer, has been falsely convicted of murdering seven people. That’s my opinion, based on overwhelming evidence.

Milat was wrongly targetted by an appalling smear campaign led by the leftist rot inside the NSW Police Force, and finally – some of the truckloads of mud thrown at him has stuck.

It adds up to this: Milat, has been made to pay for the sins of other peculiar rural men and a media witch hunt.

He is a scapegoat, not a serial killer responsible for the murders of 7 people as found by the police and the courts. In my opinion.

Declaration: I have met Milat perhaps five times in my life and like him. I am not a serial killer or even a ‘backpacker’.

The media, long held hostage by cultural marxists, militant atheists and actual marxists have long had the public believe that a psychopath in rural NSW actually committed some of the worst murders in this country.

However, when you dig deeper, when you look at the overwhelming evidence you start to find that Milat was set up by the New Zealand Tourism, in an ambitious plan to destroy Australia’s tourism industry.

It was all there, until a lot of the evidence was deleted from YouTube by YouTube, but trust me, Milat is innocent and his conviction should be quashed. His brother on the other hand, I’m not sure about.

In my opinion, this is our own OJ Simpson case, but in reverse. A man was found guilty not on the facts but on prejudice, simply because he looked like a serial killer.